Key Resources: Drug Treatment for Drug-Abusing Criminal Offenders: Insights from California's Proposition 36 and Arizona's Proposition 200

Citations from Key Results

Arizona Supreme Court (2006). Drug Treatment and Education Fund: Report detailing FY 2005.

California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. (2007). Accessing services, source of referral.

Evans E., Longshore, D., Prendergast, M., & Urada, D. (2006). Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: client characteristics, treatment completion and re-offending three years after implementation. J Psychoactive Drugs, Suppl 3, 357-67.

Evans, E., Li, L., & Hser, Y. (2008). Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders . Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Hawken, A. (2008a). Chapter 3: High-risk and hi-cost offenders in Proposition 36. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. . Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Hawken, A. (2008b). Chapter 9: Residential treatment. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. . Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Hawken, A., Anglin, D., & Conner, B. (2007). Chapter 6: Treatment differences. In Urada, D., & Hawken, A. Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. Final Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Hawken, A., Longshore, D., Urada, D., Fan, J., & Anglin, M.D. (2008). Chapter 12: Proposition 36 benefit-Cost Analysis. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. . Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Hser, Y., Evans, E., Teruya, C., Huang, D., & Anglin, M.D. (2007a). Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 187-96.

Hser, Y., Teruya, C., Brown, A., Huang, D., Evans, E., & Anglin, M.D. (2007b). Impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 104-109.

Hser, Y., Teruya, C., Evans, E., Longshore, D., Grella, C., & Farabee, D. (2003). Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes. Eval Rev, 27, 479-505.

Klein, D., Miller, R., Noble, A., & Speiglman, R. (2004). Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: Lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 723-757.

Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2000). Proposition 36. Drug treatment diversion program. Initiative statute. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office. http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2000/36_11_2000.html

Longshore, D., Evans, E., Urada, D., Teruya, C., Hardy, M., Hser, Y., Prendergast, M., and Ettner, S. (2003). Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 2002 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Longshore, D., Hawken, A., Urada, D. & Anglin, D. (2006) Cost study. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (First and Second years). Los Angeles: UCLA.

Office of Applied Studies. (2008). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2005 Discharges from substance abuse treatment services. Rockville, MD.: SAMHSA.

Rettig, R. & Yarmolinsky, A. (Eds.) (1995). Federal Regulation of Methadone Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Riley, K.J., Rodriguez, N., Ridgeway, G., Barnes-Proby, D., Fain, T., Griffith Forge, N., Webb, V., & Demaine, L. (2005). Just cause or just because? Prosecution and plea-bargaining resulting in prison sentences on low-level drug charges in California and Arizona. Santa Monica: RAND.

Rodriguez, N. & Webb, V. (2007). Probation violations, revocations, and imprisonment: The decisions of probation officers, prosecutors, and judges per- and post-mandatory drug treatment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 3-30.

Urada, D., & Evans, E. (2008a). Chapter 1: Proposition 36 Offender Characteristics. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Urada, D., & Evans, E. (2008b). Chapter 2: Treatment. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Urada, D., & Hawken, A. (2008). Chapter 11: Re-offending and Crime Trends. In Urada, D., Hawken, A, Conner, B., Evans, E., Anglin, MD, Yang, J., Teruya, C., Herbeck, D., Fan, J., Rutkowski, B., Gonzales, R., Rawson, R., Grella, C., Prendergast, M., Hser, Y., Hunter, J., & Poe, A. Evaluation of Proposition 36: The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. 2008 Report. Los Angeles: UCLA.

Webb, V., & Rodriguez, N. (2006). The impact of Arizona’s mandatory drug treatment law on prosecutorial plea bargaining in drug cases. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 1-26.

Worrall, J., Hiromoto, S., Merritt, N., Du, D., Jacobson, J., & Iguchi, M. (forthcoming) Crime trends and the effect of mandated drug treatment: Evidence from California’s Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act. Journal of Criminal Justice.